Yuri Leonardo Works — Rialengo No.3

Yuri Leonardo Works

Systems & Concepts Architect. I design and deliver solutions for businesses, architectural projects and spaces.

+1 (829) 629 1480 works@yuri-leonardo.com yuri-leonardo.com Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic LinkedInInstagram
What I do

I design and deliver the system a business, a building project or a space runs on, from the first analysis to the working tool.

Research-led: every project starts with a question. Design and analysis are the trunk; programming is the tool. Twenty years germinating in my work, formalised today in ten processes and five systems.

Yuri Leonardo

DEA, Ma., Arch. I am Yuri Leonardo — Systems & Concepts Architect. I design and deliver solutions for businesses, architectural projects and spaces.

Trained

  • Advanced Studies Diploma (DEA) in Project Criticism and Analysis — ETSAB, Barcelona
  • Master’s in Architectural Design — ETSAB, Barcelona
  • Architect — UNPHU, Santo Domingo
  • Fine Furniture Making Diploma (CAP) — École Boulle, Paris

Practice

  • Project Manager — Estudi Alfa Arquitectes, Barcelona, 2004–2008 · AUA Paul Chemetov, Paris, 2008–2011

From design to construction follow-up — housing, urban master plans, public infrastructure.

AI visualisation of the Îlot Courtille competition entry, Chartres
Îlot Courtille, Chartres, 2010. Competition entry, unbuilt. AI visualisation based on the competition image © AUA Paul Chemetov.

Across

Since 2003 I have lived and worked in Spain, France, Germany and the Dominican Republic. I work in English, Spanish and French.

  • Solo shows — Centro Cultural de España, Santo Domingo, 2014 and 2017
  • Artist in Residence — Cité Internationale des Arts, Paris, 2015–2016 · solo show, 2016
  • Dak’Art OFF Program — Dakar, 2016
Yuri Leonardo on a ladder, painting a large black mural on a white wall
Preparing Ausentes, solo show, Centro Cultural de España, Santo Domingo, 2017.

Design and production

  • Founder and Product Designer — Lar Bags, Berlin, 2016–2018. City bags made with Dominican artisans.
  • Freelance Designer — Michael Sailstorfer, Berlin, 2018. Design and construction of sculptures; exhibition design.
  • Production Manager and Specialist Fine Furniture Maker — P3 Madera Studio, Punta Cana, 2020–2021. Production protocols and quality standards; complex pieces built in person.

Public sector

  • Design Advisor and Coastal-Infrastructure Project Coordinator — Ministry of Tourism of the Dominican Republic, 2021–2023
  • Upholding the technical and architectural design standards of the Directorate’s projects.
  • Implementing new design protocols and work-ethics standards within the team.
  • Coordinating the design and implementation of those projects at territorial scale.
AI visualisation of a coastal promenade with shaded kiosks
Built project, Ministry of Tourism of the Dominican Republic. AI visualisation based on the design render.

Today

Teaching: Lecturer, PUCMM, 2021–today, Proyecto VI; UNPHU, 2021–2025.

What I solve

Businesses

Your operation in its own platform, so that it stops depending on a few people. Operations Platform.

Architectural projects

One set of data for the whole site team, and no payment for work covered before it was checked. Site Control, in development.

Spaces

A complete, priced proposal for a kitchen, a closet, a bathroom or a prefabricated pavilion, without waiting for an expert. Space Designer.

What hurts

Your business is trending towards chaos, and you spend more of every day putting out fires.

Every day starts reactive. You handle the urgent, with less time each day for the important, and tomorrow the same fire starts again.

That is not a lack of effort or of discipline. Nothing in the business decides what comes first, so urgency decides it for you — and urgency always picks the loudest thing, never the most valuable one.

The way out is not a better personal productivity system. It is deciding once, in writing, how work enters the business and in what order it gets done — so that the decision is already made before the day starts.

How much does it cost to sort out my business operations or run an operations audit?

It starts with a diagnosis —The Operation Map— with its price agreed before it starts, that sets the scope and the cost of whatever follows. The Map stands on its own: you can stop there. You pay for a result, not for open-ended hours, and anything outside the Map is an agreed change of scope, not a surprise. What comes after is one project at one price, paid out as each phase is delivered — not phases bought separately. That is what keeps the project from running away.

Do I need an AI agency to automate my business?

No. AI is execution, not a starting point: automating a badly defined process only entrenches the error faster. First you design the architecture of the operation; then agents come in as an execution layer subordinate to the process. That is what separates my work from an AI agency.

Your business depends on you. Everything goes through your hands.

If you step away for a day, the operation stops. It is not that you refuse to delegate: there is nothing to delegate to.

That is not a refusal to let go. Your business never had a floor plan — a drawing of how the work should circulate — so the only route the work has ever had is through you.

The way out is not delegating harder. It is building somewhere for the work to live other than your head, so that handing it over stops meaning explaining it again.

How do I make my business less dependent on me?

This is not a problem of personal organisation but of architecture. You get out of it by documenting the processes that currently live in your head, defining clear responsibilities, and putting in tools and execution that absorb the repetitive work. The Operation Map diagnoses where you sit at the centre and what to take off your plate first.

How do I systematise my business so it runs without me?

Systematising means designing the operation as a system: processes first, then tools, then team adoption, in that order. Buying software before the process exists only automates the confusion. It starts with a diagnosis —the Map—, priced before any work begins, that shows where you are the bottleneck, before anything gets built.

You grow, and you drown a little more.

More sales ought to be better. Instead, every new client multiplies the work only you know how to do.

That is not a sign you grew too fast. With no designed structure to carry it, volume does not spread out — it piles onto the one person who knows how everything is done.

The way out is not hiring ahead of the disorder. It is redesigning how the work circulates before you add more of it, so that the next client lands on a structure instead of on you.

My business is growing but I am more overwhelmed than ever — why?

More volume on top of an operation with no structure multiplies the owner’s load instead of spreading it. It is not solved with more hours or more hires layered on the same disorder, but by redesigning how the work circulates. The Map shows which part of the operation is not scaling with you.

How do I professionalise my operation so I can grow?

Operational infrastructure is not a software stack: it is the architecture of how work flows, with the tools serving the process rather than the other way round. Scaling means redesigning that flow so growth does not always land on one person. The Map fixes the scope of what to build first.

Your processes live in your people’s heads.

Nothing is written down. Everyone does it their own way, and critical knowledge is a single point of failure — one that draws resources and energy.

That is not a problem with your team. What was never written down cannot be taught, audited or improved. It can only be remembered — by whoever happens to still be here.

The way out is not a manual nobody opens. It is putting the process inside the tool the team already uses every day, so that following it is the path of least resistance rather than an extra task.

What do I do if all our processes are in my employees’ heads?

Undocumented knowledge is a single point of failure. The work is to draw it out, standardise it into procedures (SOPs) and leave it in the business rather than in the individuals —so the operation survives anyone’s departure. The Map identifies the critical processes and where dependence on one person exposes you.

How do I get my team to actually follow new processes?

Adoption is part of the design, not an afterthought: a process nobody follows does not exist. My work includes the adoption layer explicitly —the team learns the process inside the system it uses every day. It is the third leg of the method: processes → tools → adoption.

You no longer have guided control over the way things happen in your business. You are operating blind in open waters.

You decide on instinct because you have no numbers you trust. A dashboard on blurry data does not give you control — it gives you the illusion of it.

That is not a missing dashboard. Numbers are a by-product of work that happens the same way twice. Where the process varies, the data cannot be trusted — and measuring harder only makes the noise arrive faster.

The way out is not a dashboard on top of the mess. It is fixing what the operation records as it runs, so the numbers have somewhere true to come from before anyone plots them.

I need to get control of my operation and have real KPIs — where do I start?

Control comes from a well-defined process, not from the dashboard. First you define what to measure and where clean data comes from; the measuring tool comes afterwards, built on an operation that already circulates properly. The Operation Map establishes what is worth measuring before anything gets installed.

How is an operations consultant different from just buying software?

Software on top of a chaotic operation scales the chaos. I design the operating floor plan first —processes, then tools, then adoption— and pick the tool (and the execution AI) to serve that design. That is why the work starts with a diagnosis, not with an app.

Your company grew faster than its organisation. Now it has stalled — or it sells more and earns no more.

Your accounting team tells you what came in and what went out. Your finance team tells you where you could grow. Each department reports on its own piece — and the loss comes from the way the pieces work together.

Accounting and finance produce the evidence, and they do it well. They are not mandated to redesign the operation that generates it. A cost that rises in one department is usually decided in another; a margin that shrinks is often lost between two of them.

The way out is not another report, nor software for its own sake. It is reading the evidence your systems already produce across the company, finding where the loss starts, and redesigning the operation at the root — then building what holds the change around the systems you already have.

My accountant already tells me where I am overspending. Why would I need you?

Your accountant tells you where the money goes. Tracing it back through processes, responsibilities and tools to the way the operation is designed — and redesigning that — is a different mandate. The Operation Map does that tracing, and it quantifies, per month, what each break costs you, so the work that follows has a number to beat.

How is this different from implementing an ERP or hiring a management consultant?

The difference is where the work ends. The Operation Map stands on its own: you can stop there. If you go on, design, construction and adoption are one project at one price — and it ends with the redesigned operation running and used by your team, not with a recommendation or a configured tool.

When it works

Your company works. You want to know where its structure is already strained — before you grow.

Nothing is on fire. But the structure that got you here was never designed — it accumulated — and you suspect it will not carry the next stage.

Growth often fails inside before it fails in the market: the same processes, approvals and tools, asked to carry twice the volume, start costing more than they return. The time to find those points is while the business is healthy, not after they break.

The way out is drawing the structure you have, finding where it is already strained, and redesigning what will not hold before you open the next line or site — working alongside your leadership and your finance team, so that the strategy and the structure that has to carry it are designed together.

Do you help with a growth strategy?

Yes — working in parallel with your leadership and your finance team. They bring the market and the numbers; I bring the structure that has to carry the strategy: who decides what, how the work circulates, which tools hold it, and what has to exist before the volume arrives. A growth strategy designed without its structure is a plan the operation cannot execute.

How do I know if my company’s structure can scale?

By drawing it as it actually works today. The Operation Map shows where today’s structure is already strained and what that strain costs you per month. Those are the points to redesign before the volume arrives, not after.

That is what I do: I design the floor plan of your business with the discipline of an architectural project — processes first, then tools, then the team’s adoption. You do not start by buying a system: you start with The Operation Map, a diagnosis with its price agreed before it starts, that makes your real operation visible and sets what to build first.

Tell me what you need to solve →

Or a 45-minute conversation →

How I work

“. . . creative solutions, any problem that we have or anything we want to get better at, there’s usually a creative path to improve or at least to test to see if there are other ways around. Often the accepted version of how to move forward is another limitation.”

Rick Rubin, The Diary of a CEO

Yuri Leonardo Works designs and delivers solutions for businesses, architectural projects and spaces. For a business, I design its operating floor plan — its processes, its tools and the way a team uses them — with the discipline of an architectural project. What brings order to a building brings order to a company. That discipline comes from more than twenty years of project and design work at every scale, from furniture to territory, and from a body of work in architecture and art made with the same method. Based in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic; open to clients anywhere in the world, in English, Spanish and French, with systems and documentation delivered in your team's language.

The method

The work starts from the same operation in any domain: read the logic of a situation — a business, a place, an image — propose a different way of doing it, and build the system that supports it. How I do that is itself a method, and I wrote it down: I call it the Rhizome Method. In consulting it lands as four phases: diagnosis; process design; tool building; adoption and measurement.

Design and construction are two different processes, and construction is always subordinate to design: design while you build and you undo with your feet what you made with your hands. That is the single biggest reason a project piles up hours and drifts away from what it was for — the time goes into fixing things that were only built wrong because nobody drew the lines first.

A project opens with a single root concept and the objective it has to reach, declared at the same moment, so there is a fixed point of arrival rather than branches of thinking with nothing concrete at the end of them. From each concept no more than three follow, and between one line and the next comes a moment of verification — not of building. What it produces is a map rather than a document: when something in the finished thing fails, you go to the node that caused it, correct it there and rebuild from that point, instead of patching the object. It is built for speed, not ceremony. I design things to be used and tested in the real world.

Why a rhizome: within each project the design is a hierarchy, from the root down; between projects it is not. Projects stay connected wherever they genuinely share something, and the method itself learns from every project it builds. Every project is held in the strictest confidence: no data that belongs to one project ever reaches another. A connection that turns out not to hold is not forced: it is flagged and redesigned before anything is undone. The structure directs the work without holding it hostage — a later point can move ahead before an earlier one is closed, as long as nothing is left unconnected — and what is built goes out in short steps that can be reversed, checked independently before it reaches you.

A process also has to be designed against the way people really behave under pressure: the system fixes the order of the work in advance, so that under load the loudest request does not silently become the most important one. That is also why adoption is a phase of the work and not a hand-over: a system is not finished when it works. It is finished when the team uses it.

The work further down this page is part of the same argument. It enters not as a parallel art portfolio but as evidence of how I think, grouped under Systems, Space and Image. The site that holds it keeps one language: white and black, no shadows, no rounded corners, small editorial type.

The Operation Map

Before building anything, I draw the plan of your real operation — not the ideal one — how information actually moves through your business today, end to end, and where it breaks. That plan is The Map. It comes first, and it is a phase in its own right, because it stands on its own.

What it is

A diagnosis with its scope and its price agreed before it starts. The price is set by the complexity of the project, never by the size of the company. It is not a sales proposal, and it is not a list of features: it is the plan that makes your operation visible, locates where it jams, and turns a vague wish — "we need a new system" — into a concrete, costable scope. The Map is worth having even if you build nothing afterwards: it tells you exactly where the operation depends on a single person or a single point, and what to change first.

What follows — the four phases

The Map is the first of four phases. The three that follow are one project at one price, paid out as each is delivered — not three things bought separately.

  • Diagnosis — The Map. A document: your operation drawn on a single page, how the work happens today and who does what, and the points where time and money are lost, quantified per month.
  • Process design. Your operation redesigned on paper — flows, who owns what, the rules. You approve it before anything gets built.
  • Tool building. The internal and mobile applications that hold those processes up, built, running, and yours.
  • Adoption and measurement. Your team working inside the system, with adoption measured over a fixed cycle. This is where the change is felt, and it is a phase, not an afterthought: a process nobody follows does not exist.

The Map tells you where the operation breaks and what has to change. Writing the processes out, specifying the tools and building them is the project that follows: that is where the executable detail lives.

After the arc, an optional retainer keeps the operation evolving with the business instead of ageing.

What you are after, in the end

Internal tools that work and are obvious to whoever uses them, and a change you start to feel while the implementation is still under way: workflows that hold, a team with more energy and less improvisation, better margins, and time freed for the work that actually grows the business: winning and serving more clients.

The Map is the only way in. Start there.

Start with The Operation Map →

Or a 45-minute conversation →

Why the trades change and the method does not

What has moved me from one field to another has never been opportunity. It has been the pull of problems I did not yet know how to solve. I have never treated a new field as starting from scratch — I have treated it as an intellectual problem, and I have solved each one the same way. My strength has never been that I am a good architect, or artist, or fine furniture maker, or cook. It is that I can look at a situation head-on, identify the problem, and work out how to build the answer to it. A sculpture never sent me to sculpture school; it sent me to find out how to make it. Designing how a business works is the same move, applied to what I now find most interesting: what a business can become with the tools available today.

That move is not a personal knack. It is what I was trained to do. My postgraduate research diploma at the ETSAB in Barcelona was in the criticism and analysis of the project: taking somebody else's finished work, cutting it into its essential parts, reconstructing the design process that produced it — and then being able to explain it, reproduce it and teach it. Read outside architecture, that is the consultant's core skill: you are handed something already built, by someone else, and you have to understand how it came to be that way before you can say anything useful about changing it. A business is a finished work in exactly that sense. That training is also where the Rhizome Method comes from: the same operation run in reverse, to build rather than to read.

I chose that research: I could have taken a programme in structures or in sustainability, and chose criticism and analysis because it was what I really wanted to develop. The habit is older than the diploma: my graduation thesis of 2003, A Proposal to Inhabit, already turned essays into exercises.

Making an operation work without depending on one person

Between April 2025 and September 2026 I was the external architect for a finishes retailer in Santo Domingo, where I surveyed and redesigned the processes that run the business — from first contact with a client through to payment — and built seventeen in-house applications that support them, progressively replacing the legacy system. The full sales cycle, from first client contact through to payment, could once be run end to end by only three people; by the end, anyone on the sales team could. After a working session, the two people across the table told me they were tired of interviewing programmers and systems engineers without finding a holistic answer to their problem: what they valued was the analysis and the design. Two commissions are being built now: an administration system for a rental-property portfolio in the Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico, and the operating platform of a supplements laboratory — both past the diagnosis stage and now in design and construction. Earlier, in 2020–2021, the production protocols and quality standards of a furniture factory in Punta Cana, as its production manager.

I also build and run software of my own. One is Family Hub, a private application for families, in daily use by households in the Dominican Republic, France, Germany and Puerto Rico, which I have kept redesigning around what its users actually asked for — the same adoption discipline I sell, applied where I cannot hide behind a contract. A second, Space Designer, is a program for designing spaces — kitchens, closets, bathrooms and prefabricated pavilions — in use on real commissions.

Directing projects at every scale

Design advisor and coastal-infrastructure project coordinator at the Dominican Republic's Ministry of Tourism (2021–2023), responsible for the technical and design standards of territorial-scale projects and for implementing new design protocols and work-ethics standards within the team. Among the Directorate's projects: the reconstruction and fit-out of the Malecón of Samaná, the fit-out of Playa Las Galeras and the restructuring of the Bayahíbe sector. Before that, three years at the practice of AUA Paul Chemetov in Paris (2008–2011) as project manager, on housing, public infrastructure and education, from urban master plans down to the single building: student residences in Montreuil (4,287 m²) and Le Havre (5,000 m²), both since completed, and competitions in Chartres and in Lyon (15,500 m²). My stage covered concept and project, and my work also included construction follow-up on site; none of the projects was finished when I left the practice. And four years at Estudi Alfa Arquitectes in Barcelona (2004–2008) — social housing, single-family houses, public infrastructure projects — where, as project manager, I took projects from start to finish, including construction follow-up on site.

Running operations, not only designing them

None of this is a detour into food. From 2023 to 2025 I ran LARCA, a cook-to-order kitchen in Santo Domingo, as chef and owner. And I was made manager of The Klub Kitchen in Berlin for what I could do outside the kitchen — inventory, purchasing, catering logistics and profitability, in a restaurant serving more than four hundred dishes a day (November 2018 – June 2020). That is business management, and it is the same capability I am hired for now: an operation is an operation, whatever it produces. Earlier, in Berlin, I founded and designed Lar Bags, a line of city bags made in direct collaboration with Dominican artisans, bringing that craft to international markets.

Writing, lecturing, teaching

I have lectured since 2008 and published essays since 2010. Among them my essay About Galerías: an Extinct Species in the Dominican Spatial Fauna (2014), written for Tropical Ghosts Project, a work commissioned by Storefront for Art and Architecture, New York; and, in 2018, the lecture Primitive Being in the c.XXII: Migration · LGBTQ · Artificial Intelligence at UNPHU — I was lecturing on artificial intelligence in 2018. Since 2021 I have taught design studio and theory and criticism of art and architecture at PUCMM, where I now hold the Proyecto VI design studio, and, until December 2025, concurrently at UNPHU.

And a body of work of my own

Two things here, and they are not the same. In 2018, as a freelance designer for Michael Sailstorfer, I designed and built a series of sculptures for several of his exhibitions of that period — the full-scale originals, in cardboard and tape, from which subcontractors produced the casts and the hyperrealist finish — and worked with him on the exhibition design and the selection of works for those shows. My own work is a separate thing, and it is ongoing: drawing, collage and sculpture since 2011. The drawings and collages of 2011–2014 were shown in the first of my three solo exhibitions, O Tender Fellows, at the Centro Cultural de España in Santo Domingo (2014). The other two are Monsters – Working on Absence (The Corridor, Cité Internationale des Arts, Paris, 2016, curated by Corinne Loisel) and Ausentes (Centro Cultural de España, 2017). Separately: nine months as a resident at the Cité Internationale des Arts in Paris, and Prisoners, a fifty-four-metre installation in Dak'Art 2016 — OFF Program, commissioned by IFAA and curated by Sithabile Mlotshwa. It has been exhibited in France, Germany, Senegal, Lithuania and the Dominican Republic. The exhibitions start in 2014 and the work has been continuous since — commissions, exhibitions and projects, to this day. Rialengo No.3, 2015: the drawing for a sculpture built that same year — now the mark of Yuri Leonardo Works.

Employment has never interrupted the independent practice: since 2003 the two have run in parallel. I work from Santo Domingo, in Spanish, English and French.

Continuous improvement

Most of what a project teaches stays inside that project. Here, every project leaves numbered improvements, and the ones that serve other projects move into the shared templates and tools that every new project starts from. Each new project opens by integrating the improvements that apply to it, and closes each one: applied, or not applicable and why. Every project I deliver can still be improved, for the next client.

To date: 919 improvements recorded across 6 client projects and the system that runs them, 520 of them useful beyond the place where they were born, 92 already built into shared tools and 9 already integrated by another project. The Construction Documents Engine went through seventeen official revisions before its 451 sheets were delivered. What was learned once is not learned again at the next client's expense.

Current Portfolio

I work by method, not by style: ten processes, each traced to the dated works where it grew and to the system where you can hire it today.

SPACE DESIGNER In use on real commissions. From the interior to the module and its site: one generic core, each client a configuration 2026
1/4

SPACE DESIGNER

/ In use on real commissions. From the interior to the module and its site: one generic core, each client a configuration /

YEAR:
2026
STATUS:
in use on commissions
CLIENT:
YLW — own product
SCOPE:
kitchens, closets, bathrooms and prefabricated pavilions · design from nothing or from a SketchUp model · quotation · drawings · factory breakdown · render briefs anchored to the model

Space Designer is a design and sales programme that takes a space from the interior to the module and its site. For kitchens, closets and bathrooms, it lets a salesperson with basic product knowledge produce a complete, priced proposal without an expert; for a prefabricated pavilion, it structures the module, its support kit, water, energy and service core, and switches the same model between forest and coast.

It designs from nothing or from an existing SketchUp model, and from one project source it produces the quotation, the layout and installation drawings, the factory breakdown, the product list and render briefs anchored to the model: client documents and workshop documents that never contradict each other. A missing figure is flagged, never guessed. In use on commissions since August 2026; a delivered closet commission was reproduced 14 of 14 plans identical, its price list to the cent.

The research question

How does a company produce a complete, priced, buildable proposal without depending on its expert?

Processes it proves

Drawing to Build — one project source gives the quotation, the drawings and the factory breakdown.

Start from what exists

Core and configurations — one generic core; each client a configuration, with its own branch of a library of 42 models and 209 finishes.

One drawing, any medium — the same model gives quotation, drawings and render, and moves one pavilion between a forest and a coast.

Without the designer in the room — a salesperson without an expert produces the complete, priced proposal.

Problem

Selling a kitchen, a closet or a bathroom usually waits for a designer, and when price, drawings and images come from different files, they contradict each other. The salesperson cannot close alone, and the client's documents and the workshop's drift apart.

Functions

  • Designs from scratch: which layouts fit a room, by clearance standards, before any model exists.
  • Draws the plan and places each work zone along the run.
  • Reads an existing SketchUp model by script, in one pass: no dimension is typed by hand.
  • Generates plans and elevations from the model.
  • Prices every piece from the manufacturer's catalogue, with each factor traced to its source; where the catalogue grid and a drawn width disagree, the catalogue governs the price and the drawing keeps the geometry.
  • Prices kitchens module by module, with side panels, plinths and installation, and flags inconsistencies in an existing quote.
  • Measures and prices worktops by surface, layer and material.
  • Lists every element by room for the client.
  • Breaks every sold item into manufacturable parts and the factory order.
  • Carries the job through installation, logistics and handover.
  • Produces the kitchen dossier and its specification.
  • Assembles the print-ready dossier: drawings, element list, quotation and images.
  • Generates render anchors from the model, so the image engine cannot invent geometry, and one image brief per view, every brief carrying the same invariants: a correction reaches every view.
  • Cross-checks every view of a project against the others before delivery.
  • Reads a manufacturer's PDF price list into the catalogue and declares a gap instead of guessing a price.
  • Designs bathrooms with the same core.
  • Structures a project as one prefabricated module, transported finished and craned into place, standing on a support kit chosen for its site: raised frames in a forest, a low base on piles by the sea.
  • Draws the water of the whole site: every roof collects rain into a shared cistern, an elevated tank feeds each unit by gravity, and waste runs to one common septic system.
  • Sizes an off-grid supply from the model: solar panels, battery storage that grows in blocks, an inverter and a backup generator.
  • Gathers tank, cistern, pump, batteries and generator into one prefabricated service core, out of the guests' sight.
  • Lays out a site of any number of units around its service core and networks.
  • Prices a site in four layers (module, site works, shared core divided by the number of units, design), so every unit added lowers the cost of the others; optional air conditioning is one switch.
  • Switches the same model between forest and coast: support kit, water treatment and salt protection follow the site.
  • Serves any manufacturer or retailer by configuration alone.
  • Hands each client a byte-identical branch of the finish library, refuses to branch twice, and states on every output which library, and of which date, it read.
  • Issues print and video formats from the approved images, and prints straight to PDF.
  • Checks the package before anything is issued, and stops with a reason instead of issuing a broken document.

How it works

One generic core that knows no client by name; each client is a configuration with its own branch of the YLW finish library, handed over on delivery. A guard test fails if any client reaches the core. Every empty field is shown as pending and counted, never filled with a generic. Each stage (plans, prices, lists, render anchors, dossier) has its own test bench, and the benches are falsified: a deliberately broken input must make them fail. Supplier terms stay in the workshop documents; the client reads the client's words.

Two services. Space Designer as a service: the proposal, drawings and images under your own brand, with an image-use agreement for your portfolio. And, through Systems consulting, a sibling of Space Designer built for your company, on your catalogue and your process. The software itself is not sold.

Scenarios

  • A furniture manufacturer hands the program to its dealer network, each dealer a branch of the same library.
  • A finishes retailer lets any salesperson close a kitchen, closet or bathroom without a designer.
  • An interior design studio quotes made-to-measure furniture from its own model.
  • A developer offers kitchens and closets by apartment type, with a price and an image before anything is built.
  • A hospitality developer places a site of pavilions in a forest or on a coast, with its water, energy and a price per unit before anything is built.

Evidence

  • In use on real commissions since August 2026.
  • A delivered closet commission reproduced by the program: 14 of 14 plans identical to the delivered ones, the 122-line price list to the cent, the 67-line element list, 17 of 17 render anchors and the 15-page dossier.
  • A delivered kitchen reproduced module by module (30 modules) and worktop by worktop, matching what was delivered.
  • The full chain runs green, 16 of 16 stages, and design from scratch passes 62 tests (run on 9 October 2026).
  • Thirteen outputs verified by execution on 8 September 2026 and again on 6 October 2026, among them 63 of 63 mutants caught and a model check of 169 with no failure.
  • Kitchen pricing passes 23 checks; run on a quote already delivered, it found five inconsistencies.
  • Closet pricing catches 13 of 13 deliberately planted faults; input and output validation passes 31 of 31 checks (October 2026).
  • See it applied: Pavilion →, one module in a forest and on a coast.
SITE CONTROL One set of data for the whole site team, and gates that prevent paying for work covered without being checked 2026

SITE CONTROL

/ One set of data for the whole site team, and gates that prevent paying for work covered without being checked /

YEAR:
2026
STATUS:
in development
CLIENT:
YLW — own tool
SCOPE:
construction drawings to handover · eight data formats · gates before payment and before the pour · reports by role

Site Control, in development, guides, records and centralises every process of a construction site, from construction drawings to handover, so that the whole team works from the same data and the program guards against the human errors that a large volume of information and long processes produce. It reads the formats a site already uses: BC3, BCF, BVBS, CSV, IFC, Presto, Project and XLSX.

It is written to prevent paying for work covered without being checked and, at the next stage, the pour itself until it is released; when a new version or a contradiction appears, it reopens what was already signed off. Every record is linked to its place in the model, every act needs the authority of its role, and each company configures its catalogue, roles and users. On a test project, 53 of 53 end-to-end checks pass (measured on 7 October 2026).

The research question

Which act on a site has to be prevented first?

Processes it proves

Start from what exists

The map as method — every record linked to its place in the BIM model.

Core and configurations — catalogue, roles and users configured per company; several sites at once.

1 ≠ 1 — what is certified is not always what was built: it is written to stop payment for covered work that was not inspected, then the pour, and to reopen what was signed off.

The work of another — every act carries the authority of its role.

Without the designer in the room — gates by role against human error.

Problem

On a construction site, drawings, budgets, schedules and site records live apart, and a large volume of information over a long process produces human errors. The first one to prevent: work certified and paid for after it has been covered, without anyone checking it.

Functions

  • Guides, records and centralises every construction process on one set of data.
  • Opens on what is due today, on desktop and on site.
  • Reads BC3, BCF, BVBS, CSV, IFC, Presto, Project and XLSX files.
  • Keeps one copy of every record, with its owner: the version in force and the full history of who did what, in which role and when.
  • Reopens a point already crossed when a new version or a contradiction appears; nothing is released until a role with authority chooses the way out.
  • Shows every role the same data, and each one what is due for it now; each person enters with a PIN, and every act needs the authority of its role.
  • Prevents certifying and paying for work covered without being checked.
  • Prevents the pour itself until it is released.
  • Runs several sites at once.
  • Links each record to its place in the model.
  • Keeps, for each type of item, its scheme: model, views, render, breakdown and installation.
  • Issues reports for every role.
  • Is configured per company: catalogue, roles and users.

How it works

One calculation engine over one set of data. Each connector translates a format into that data and carries its own tests. What the program must prevent is a design decision written into it, by stages, not a setting someone can switch off. The app is built on a test project with no data from a real site, and is held by a smoke test, by test benches for each line of the design and by mutation tests on the engine.

Scenarios

  • A mid-sized contractor with several sites and a single control manager.
  • A site supervisor who certifies the work of third parties.
  • A developer who audits payments against real progress.
  • The oversight of public works.

Evidence

  • Smoke test, 53 of 53; engine and design benches, 27 of 27, 9 of 9 and 31 of 31; connectors, 27 of 27 across eight formats (measured on 7 October 2026).
  • Mutation tests on the engine that catch planted faults.
  • Desktop and phone interfaces, with printed formats, on a test project.
  • Designed from a root sentence written on 15 September 2026.
FAMILY HUB For families living in different countries: if a grandparent cannot publish alone from a phone, it is badly designed 2026

FAMILY HUB

/ For families living in different countries: if a grandparent cannot publish alone from a phone, it is badly designed /

YEAR:
2026
STATUS:
in production
CLIENT:
YLW — own product
SCOPE:
private multi-family space · trilingual, translated per entry · phone first · nothing indexable

A private web space for families whose members live in different countries: a daily log, a map of journeys whose stops link to their days, albums, one profile per member. The design threshold was written in one line: if the youngest member or a grandparent cannot publish alone from a phone in under a minute, it is badly designed.

Each entry is signed by its author, written in the author's own language, Spanish, French or German, and translated automatically into the other two. One code base serves every family, each isolated from every other in the database. There are no likes and no metrics, and nothing can be indexed. In production since July 2026, it is in daily use by five families in the Dominican Republic, France, Germany and Puerto Rico.

The research question

How does a family spread across countries keep its memory, without likes, metrics or indexing?

Processes it proves

The map as method

Core and configurations — one code base.

One drawing, any medium — one entry, three languages: Spanish, French and German.

Without the designer in the room

Problem

Families whose members live in different countries see each other rarely, and what they share ends up scattered across chats and social networks: in different languages, unsigned, measured in likes and open to indexing. And a grandparent or a child cannot always publish on their own.

Functions

  • Gives each family its own space, isolated from every other family in the database.
  • Lets each member write in their own language (Spanish, French or German) and read the others' entries translated into theirs.
  • Publishes from a phone in under a minute, and installs on the phone's home screen like an app.
  • Keeps a daily log, with back-dated entries for earlier memories; chapters and a yearly archive; albums by place; a travel map whose stops link to their days; one profile per member.
  • Runs polls by topic, with several questions each; comments as a family conversation, retranslated when edited; events and sub-events with their own times and places; and a summary of what is new since your last visit.
  • Locks again with the PIN after ten minutes without activity, and carries its own help in each language.
  • Signs every entry with its author.
  • Lets each member enter with their own PIN; profiles exist by invitation only.
  • Has no likes, no metrics and nothing that can be indexed.

How it works

One code base serves every family. Each family is isolated by row-level security in the database, and a test proves that one family cannot read another's entries; a second test keeps the three languages of the interface in step. Each entry is translated automatically, and a toggle shows it in the reader's language. The design threshold is written in one line: if the youngest member or a grandparent cannot publish alone from a phone, it is badly designed.

Scenarios

  • A family with members in several countries.
  • A closed community, such as former classmates or an association.
  • The private diary of a long journey or of a move abroad.

Evidence

  • In production since July 2026; five families today.
  • In daily use in the Dominican Republic, France, Germany and Puerto Rico, and redesigned according to what its users asked.
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ENGINE Quantities, shop sheets and dossiers read from the 3D model: every billed piece drawn where it goes 2026
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ENGINE, image 1 of 9
1/9

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ENGINE

/ Quantities, shop sheets and dossiers read from the 3D model: every billed piece drawn where it goes /

YEAR:
2026
STATUS:
in use on commissions
CLIENT:
YLW — own tool
SCOPE:
quantities by room · shop sheets · dimensioned isometric sheets · fabrication sheets · quotation dossiers by trade

The Construction Documents Engine turns a 3D model into the documents a site and a workshop work from: quantity tables room by room, shop sheets with every dimension read from the model, dimensioned isometric sheets, fabrication sheets and quotation dossiers per trade. Every bar is cut to length and board usage is optimised room by room. A figure without a source blocks the issue, and a test rejects the document if any element appears without its supports. Each project is a configuration of one engine.

For the suspended ceilings of a school under construction, 451 sheets were delivered on 28 September 2026, at revision 17, room by room and detail by detail, with every hanger rod billed in the tables drawn where it goes; sets of 128 and 254 sheets had been delivered on 21 and 25 September. In 2026 it was used on five commissions.

The research question

How do you order a system with no shortfall and no surplus, and defend the figure?

Processes it proves

Drawing to Build — every piece that is billed, drawn where it goes.

Start from what exists — the model is read by script.

Core and configurations

One drawing, any medium — one dump of the model feeds sheets, tables, isometrics and dossiers.

1 ≠ 1 — bars cut to length, board usage optimised, waste tabulated.

Without the designer in the room — the contractor can defend the figure without the designer.

Problem

A contractor has to order a system (a suspended ceiling, partitions, metalwork, joinery) without shortfall or surplus, and defend the figure to whoever reviews it. Quantities typed from drawings by hand cannot be traced back, and without every piece drawn where it goes, the count is only theory.

Functions

  • Derives quantity tables, room by room, from the model's scenes.
  • Sets out hangers and supports at a fixed spacing and cuts every bar to length.
  • Lays out the ceiling grid symmetrically and optimises board usage across a room, with the waste tabled.
  • Prices each item with a reference price and the supplier's code; open data points are declared on the drawing, never invented.
  • Produces tabloid shop sheets (11 × 17) with every dimension read from the model.
  • Generates dimensioned isometric sheets and a quotation dossier per trade.
  • Draws fabrication sheets for metalwork straight from the model.
  • Rejects the document if any element appears without its supports.
  • Blocks the issue while any figure lacks a source.
  • Checks every issue before it leaves: the PDF against its source sentence by sentence, labels outside the sheet, overlaps, and drawing scales against their labels.
  • Translates supplier terms into the client's words and stops if one leaks.
  • Serves any model and any project by configuration, on any machine.

How it works

The model is read by script, never by eye: one dump of the 3D model (parts, boxes, scenes, materials) feeds every sheet, table and figure, and where a quantity cannot come from the model it is set out by rule and drawn. Each generator carries its own checks; the critical gates have test benches and are falsified: a planted fault must make the bench fail. On the main commissions, two independent reviewers diagnose each revision blind, and their findings are crossed before anything is issued.

Scenarios

  • A drywall and ceiling contractor that needs quantities it can defend to the site's cost control.
  • A metal or joinery workshop that receives fabrication sheets without redrawing them.
  • A practice that prices each trade from the model before a budget exists.
  • An audit of a third party's quantities: the model against their take-off.

Evidence

  • Suspended ceilings of a school under construction: 451 sheets at 11 × 17, delivered on 28 September 2026, room by room and detail by detail, with 646 hanger rods spaced evenly along each main runner, none carrying more than 1.44 m² of ceiling, and every rod billed in the tables drawn where it goes. Earlier revisions were delivered on 21 September 2026 (128 sheets, 775 rods) and on 25 September 2026 (254 sheets, after an independent review that left no open finding).
  • Every drawing at the exact scale it is labelled: 40 views that deviated by more than 1 % were measured and corrected.
  • The current revision holds its test bench at 127 of 127 checks, with 123 of 123 planted faults caught; a first variant, at 108 of 108 and 94 of 94.
  • The gate «every suspended ceiling is hung» catches 3 of 3 planted faults (run on 21 September 2026).
  • Fabrication sheets for luminaire brackets drawn from the model, with two falsification benches.
  • Four kitchen types for one project: dimensions declared once in code, 282 pieces priced with no price gap, and a supplier-term guard proved by falsification.
  • Quotation dossiers per trade for a house remodelling, with isometric sheets dimensioned from the model; the overlap check, falsified, caught six real overlaps.
  • Used on five commissions in 2026.
OPERATIONS PLATFORM A company's operations in its own app: data entered once, status calculated, every gap declared 2025–2026

OPERATIONS PLATFORM

/ A company's operations in its own app: data entered once, status calculated, every gap declared /

YEAR:
2025–2026
STATUS:
in production · in use
CLIENT:
YLW — own tool
SCOPE:
sales to payment · clients and projects · inventory · contracts · fees · roles enforced in the database

The Operations Platform carries the operations of an organisation, sales, clients, projects, collections, inventory, contracts, fees, into its own app and intranet, designed for how that organisation works. The operation is mapped before anything is built. Each piece of data is entered once and appears wherever it is needed; status is calculated, never typed; every missing figure appears as a declared gap, exported to whoever must supply it. Permissions are enforced in the database, not hidden in the screen.

At a construction-finishes retailer, a sales cycle that only three people could run end to end can now be run by any member of the sales team, on seventeen in-house applications, from first contact to payment. YLW runs on it too: the practice's own registry of every project, from the first lead to the last invoice.

The research question

Where are errors born in an operation?

Processes it proves

Start from what exists — every missing figure becomes a declared gap.

The map as method — at YLW, that map is the rhizome.

Core and configurations — one tested kit, one platform per organisation.

One drawing, any medium — help and printed manual come from one source.

1 ≠ 1

Without the designer in the room — works offline, automates recurring entries and enforces permissions in the database.

Problem

Small organisations run on messages, spreadsheets and handwritten ledgers. The same figure is typed in several places, the status of a sale, a property or a payment is whatever someone last wrote, and a missing figure goes unnoticed.

Functions

  • Takes each piece of data once and shows it in every module that needs it.
  • Calculates status instead of letting anyone type it; what has not been measured reads «not measured», never green; a manual override is labelled as such.
  • Names who made every cash movement.
  • Stamps deadlines on the server, not on the user's device, and deactivates records instead of deleting them.
  • Turns every missing piece of data into a declared gap and exports the list to whoever must supply it.
  • Enforces permissions by role in the database, not in the screen.
  • Gives each person their own PIN.
  • Generates the in-app help and the printed manual from one source, so they say the same thing; no change reaches production without updating the tutorials it affects.
  • Works offline.
  • Puts the variable data of contract templates in fields, so no one searches nine pages for a figure.
  • Keeps one registry from the first lead to the last invoice, with a leads inbox.
  • Moves a lead to a client without retyping.
  • Automates recurring entries and scales as the operation grows.
  • Gives each organisation its own platform from one tested kit: data adapter, gap engine, database roles, PIN.

How it works

New platforms are designed from one root sentence and one objective before anything is built, and take shape as small applications over one database, typically a phone app to record and a desktop intranet to compare and report. Rules are held by automated test harnesses; on most platforms, mutation scripts break the app on purpose to prove that the tests fail when they should. Every screen shown outside uses demonstration data, never real names.

Scenarios

  • A family business that runs on spreadsheets and messages.
  • A school or an academy that collects its fees by hand.
  • A property owner with a portfolio and no administrative staff.
  • A professional practice that needs its own registry of projects.

Evidence

  • A construction-finishes retailer: a sales cycle that only three people could run end to end; today any member of the sales team can run it, on seventeen in-house applications, from first contact to payment, progressively replacing a legacy system.
  • A supplements laboratory: one mobile app for the whole business, in use while it is being built; every cash movement names the partner who made it; its help and its 15-page printed manual come from one source.
  • A private rental portfolio under three regimes: a phone app and a desktop intranet on one code base, with 577 automated checks in ten test harnesses (last recorded run, September 2026).
  • A private school: first an instrument of seventeen modules in which every missing piece of data appears as a declared gap, exported by recipient; since October 2026, a live database.
  • A private investment portfolio: an app of eight tabs with 142 automated checks and a script that breaks it on purpose (run on 1 September 2026).
  • Proyecto VI, an architecture design studio at PUCMM: each submission, critique and reference has one place; late submissions are stamped by the server, and students are deactivated, never deleted.
  • YLW runs on it. YLW-Central is the practice's own registry of every project, from the first lead to the last invoice; the project index, the pipeline and the leads inbox are in use, and the rest is drawn before it is built. Two roles, owner and guest, are enforced in the database, not in the screen, and row-level security is active on all nine of its tables (measured on 9 October 2026).

Download the tool sheet (PDF)

HOLIDAY VILLA Repairs before going onto short-stay platforms; its expense record later served as an approximate measure of suppliers' lead times for another house 2026
Photography: Moisés De Jesús
Photography: Moisés De Jesús
1/9

HOLIDAY VILLA

/ Repairs before going onto short-stay platforms; its expense record later served as an approximate measure of suppliers' lead times for another house /

LOCATION:
Punta Cana, Dominican Republic
COMMISSIONED BY:
private client
YEAR:
2026
STATUS:
completed
PROGRAM:
repairs and fit-out of a holiday villa for short-stay rental
POSITION:
design and works coordination
PHOTOGRAPHY:
Moisés De Jesús

A villa in Punta Cana, on a golf course, needed repairs before going onto short-stay platforms: paint, leaks, electrical work. The brief set a target guest and asked for a durable fit-out with low maintenance, and for professional photographs that would show the qualities of the space, the fairway as well as the house. The works were completed in 2026; the photographs are by Moisés De Jesús.

Its expense record, payment by payment, later served as an approximate measure of suppliers' real lead times, and went into the works programme of a house remodelling in Santo Domingo.

The research question

How long do suppliers really take, measured payment by payment?

Processes it proves

Start from what exists — repairs according to the real condition of the house.

1 ≠ 1 — 1 ≠ 1 in time: real supplier lead times, measured payment by payment, later set another house's works programme.

REMODELLING OF A SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE A house to let to six to ten guests; the design starts from what was actually built, not from what was planned 2026
REMODELLING OF A SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE, image 1 of 12
1/12

REMODELLING OF A SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE

/ A house to let to six to ten guests; the design starts from what was actually built, not from what was planned /

LOCATION:
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
COMMISSIONED BY:
private client
YEAR:
2026
STATUS:
in progress
PROGRAM:
remodelling of a single-family house for rental to groups of six to ten guests
POSITION:
design and works coordination
SYSTEMS LAYER:
built with the Construction Documents Engine — the existing house modelled and read by script, verified independently; quotation dossiers by trade, every dimension taken from the model

A house in Santo Domingo, in very good condition, being adapted for rental to executives and families, groups of six to ten guests. The first works, planned as minor repairs, were in fact the demolition of a gazebo and the construction of a platform for a spa: the design starts from what was actually built, not from what was planned.

The existing house was modelled exactly as it stands and read by script with my Construction Documents Engine, verified independently; the quotation dossiers by trade take every dimension from the model. The works programme draws on suppliers' lead times measured, payment by payment, at a holiday villa. The spa is now to be moved, and the current stage is the garden around it.

The research question

What does a remodelling gain when it starts from the house as built, not as planned?

Processes it proves

Drawing to Build — quotation dossiers by trade, every dimension taken from the model.

Start from what exists — the existing house modelled exactly as it stands, not as its plans said.

1 ≠ 1 — the survey is the design tolerance; the lead times measured at a holiday villa set the works programme.

LAR BAGS A bag that goes completely flat when empty, made with Dominican artisans to bring their craft to international markets 2016
LAR BAGS, image 1 of 7
1/7

LAR BAGS

/ A bag that goes completely flat when empty, made with Dominican artisans to bring their craft to international markets /

LOCATION:
Berlin, Germany
YEAR:
2016 – 2018
STATUS:
produced on commission
FORMAT:
product design
DIMENSIONS:
500 × 600 × 200 mm (tankroller) / 500 × 500 × 200 mm (tinroller) / 500 × 400 × 200 mm (master-Y)
MATERIALS:
leather, waterproof canvas
POSITION:
brand founder / project designer
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Adolfo Fariña (saddler)

A line of urban bags in three models, for a Berlin brand I founded. My text for the project opens with a scene in Paris: a man on a bike, an empty shoulder bag folded around his body like a jacket. The response is a large bag that goes completely flat when empty, sized for a whole day of working tools: one 500 × 200 mm body in three heights, 600, 500 and 400 mm, in leather and waterproof canvas.

The making was part of the project. The design was broken down into parts so that it could be made without the designer in the room, by a saddler, Adolfo Fariña, and Dominican artisans, bringing the quality of their craft to international markets. The bags were produced on commission.

The research question

How does Dominican craft reach international markets?

Processes it proves

Drawing to Build — drawn so that a saddler, Adolfo Fariña, and Dominican artisans could produce it.

Core and configurations

Without the designer in the room

JUAN BOSCH CITY A plan traced from its doors — competition, 2013 2013
JUAN BOSCH CITY, image 1 of 3
1/3

JUAN BOSCH CITY

/ A plan traced from its doors — competition, 2013 /

LOCATION:
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
COMMISSIONED BY:
Municipality of the City of Santo Domingo
YEAR:
2013
STATUS:
Competition (Finalist)
PROGRAM:
masterplan
POSITION:
project architect
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Shearly Investment Group / Juan Mubarak (project director)

Master-plan competition, 2013, for a new city in Santo Domingo, in which we were finalists; project architect, with Juan Mubarak as project director. The site's perimeter is formed by a series of peripheral elements that press its limits toward the geometric centre; the result is a polygon whose vertices act as doors to the rest of the city and to the interior of the country. The inner structure of the plan is traced by connecting those doors, and a wind study orients the blocks.

The plan is based on a system in which every element can hold several complementary positions at once: keeping its functioning coherent with the development of its context, and constantly regenerating itself to adapt to future territorial realities, so guaranteeing the city's continuity in time.

The research question

How does a new city guarantee its continuity in time?

Processes it proves

Start from what exists — a wind study orients every block.

The map as method — a polygon whose vertices are doors to the city and to the interior of the country.

Core and configurations — every element holds several complementary positions at once: the first statement of this process.

SAN ISIDRO Triangular open-air pockets on a difficult site, each giving its part of the courtyard a scale of its own 2013
SAN ISIDRO, image 1 of 3
1/3

SAN ISIDRO

/ Triangular open-air pockets on a difficult site, each giving its part of the courtyard a scale of its own /

LOCATION:
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
COMMISSIONED BY:
Shearly Investment Group
YEAR:
2013
STATUS:
commissioned study
PROGRAM:
residential / 240 apartments
POSITION:
architect-in-charge
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Juan Mubarak (project director)

Commissioned study, 2013, for 240 apartments in Santo Domingo, for Shearly Investment Group; architect-in-charge, with Juan Mubarak as project director. The site has a difficult shape and is bounded on three of its four sides by an avenue and two streets.

The problem was to distribute the 240 apartments so that they answer their urban situation, relate to the low-density buildings around them and, at the same time, hold a structured dialogue with the interior of the site. The project opens a series of triangular open-air pockets, each giving a different scale and identity to its part of the courtyard: the diversity of scale around the site, read as a map, carried inside.

The research question

How do 240 apartments answer their urban situation and hold a dialogue with the interior of their site?

Processes it proves

Start from what exists — the low scale around it sets the scale of each pocket.

The map as method — the diversity of scales around the site, read as a map, carried into the courtyard.

Core and configurations — one courtyard is the core; the triangular pockets are its configurations.

OBJECT BORDER A border read as a region, 2012–2013 2012–2013
OBJECT BORDER, image 1 of 14
1/14

OBJECT BORDER

/ A border read as a region, 2012–2013 /

LOCATION:
Haitian–Dominican border
YEAR:
2012 – 2013
STATUS:
study development
FORMAT:
analysis for the proposal of a new Haitian–Dominican border region
POSITION:
architect-in-charge
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Shaney Peña Gómez (associate architect)

Study, 2012–2013, for a new Dominican–Haitian border region; architect-in-charge, with Shaney Peña Gómez as associate architect. A border is not a line: it is a region. The line read as the border is a graphic representation of one aspect of a larger reality, the centre of a region more complex than a political symbol.

Haiti and the Dominican Republic develop outward from their capitals, which leaves the border as the furthest point of each country and penalises its growth. Starting from the real region, a quarter of the island, a series of maps identifies the infrastructure that would give it economic and political autonomy in proportion to its size and, in a second phase, a supranational connection. It follows Cartography of an Object (UNPHU, 2008), a workshop on the same border.

The research question

If centralisation from two capitals penalises the border, what would give the region autonomy and a connection beyond both countries?

Processes it proves

Start from what exists — it starts from the real region, a quarter of the island, not from the line.

The map as method

MARCANO MUSEUM A spiral among 107 trees — commissioned study, 2011–2012 2011–2012
MARCANO MUSEUM, image 1 of 3
1/3

MARCANO MUSEUM

/ A spiral among 107 trees — commissioned study, 2011–2012 /

LOCATION:
Botanical Garden, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
COMMISSIONED BY:
Atabey Innovation Center
YEAR:
2011 – 2012
STATUS:
commissioned study
PROGRAM:
museum
AREA:
2,400 m²
POSITION:
architect-in-charge
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Shaney Peña Gómez (associate architect)

Commissioned study, 2011–2012, for a national museum devoted to the lifework of the Dominican scientist Eugenio de Jesús Marcano, on a site within the Botanical Garden of Santo Domingo; architect-in-charge, with Shaney Peña Gómez as associate architect. If there is one place where a project must not fell trees, it is a botanical garden: the map of the 107 trees already on the site gave the museum its ideal space, and every one of them is kept.

The model came from criticism: my 2010 essay on the Ideal Museum, read from Semper's spiral to Wright's Guggenheim. Taken to the site, it became a horizontal spiral that guides visitors through the exhibition around three courtyards while they stay in contact with the vegetation. The north side opens entirely to the garden; the south façade is a long vertical garden that filters the Caribbean sun.

The research question

How do you build the Ideal Museum on a site whose trees cannot be touched?

Processes it proves

Start from what exists — 107 existing trees fix the plan; not one is felled.

The map as method — the map of the trees gives the museum its ideal space.

From analysis to project — the Ideal Museum, read in my 2010 essay from Semper's spiral to Wright's Guggenheim, taken to the site: a horizontal spiral among 107 trees.

GREATER HELSINKI VISION 2050 A ring for a dispersed region — competition, 2007 2007
GREATER HELSINKI VISION 2050, image 1 of 6
1/6

GREATER HELSINKI VISION 2050

/ A ring for a dispersed region — competition, 2007 /

LOCATION:
Helsinki, Finland
COMMISSIONED BY:
Helsinki Region Municipalities / Finnish Ministry of the Environment / Finnish Association of Architects
YEAR:
2007
STATUS:
competition
PROGRAM:
masterplan
POSITION:
architect-in-charge
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Laura Barbieri, Eugenio Mangi (architects)
MATERIALS (MODEL):
plexiglas

Competition entry, 2007, for a 2050 vision of the Greater Helsinki region, as architect-in-charge with the architects Laura Barbieri and Eugenio Mangi. The region sits on a transversal axis, from western Uusimaa to the Russian border, that splits at Helsinki into two national routes; it had grown radially from the city, losing importance and density as it moved away.

To reduce that dispersion, the proposal sews the two routes together with two axes, two different ways of connecting Mäntsälä and Helsinki. Superposed, they draw a possible relation between the scales of data exchange, global, national and regional, and those of territory. The municipalities form a ring, which allows significant natural areas to be drawn inside it. The plan was built as a plexiglas model.

The research question

How do the scales of data exchange relate to the scales of territory?

Processes it proves

The map as method — the region read on its transversal axis and its radial growth.

Core and configurations — Helsinki, two axes and a ring of municipalities.

One drawing, any medium — the plan becomes a plexiglas model.

A PROPOSAL TO INHABIT The Dominican dwelling, from the minimal traditional unit to a coherent residential space: a question that returns in About Galerías 2003
A PROPOSAL TO INHABIT, image 1 of 4
1/4

A PROPOSAL TO INHABIT

/ The Dominican dwelling, from the minimal traditional unit to a coherent residential space: a question that returns in About Galerías /

LOCATION:
School of Architecture and Urbanism, UNPHU, Santo Domingo
YEAR:
2003
STATUS:
completed
FORMAT:
architecture degree dissertation
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Juan Mubarak, Giovanni Pérez Linval (thesis advisors)
EXHIBITIONS:
Santo Domingo International Architecture Biennial, Museo de Arte Moderno (Santo Domingo, 2006) — prize

Graduation thesis at UNPHU, Santo Domingo, 2003, with Juan Mubarak and Giovanni Pérez Linval as advisors, awarded at the 2006 edition of the Santo Domingo International Architecture Biennial. The problem it set itself was the Dominican dwelling: how to move from the minimal traditional unit to a coherent residential space for the modern Dominican individual.

Through a group of essays turned into exercises, the thesis proposed a dwelling that takes into its core the temporality of present-day life and the cycles that define its needs. Its module is the Portable House. The Dominican dwelling returns eleven years later, in my essay About Galerías (2014), as the loss of the gallery.

The research question

How does the Dominican dwelling move from the minimal traditional unit to a coherent residential space?

Processes it proves

Core and configurations — the minimum unit is the core; the cycles of a life are its configurations.

One drawing, any medium — the thesis takes physical form in the model of its module, the Portable House.

From analysis to project — essays turned into exercises: the root of this process, in 2003.

PORTABLE HOUSE A prefabricated module, able to settle into any natural setting, with one kit for each site 2003
PORTABLE HOUSE, image 1 of 7
1/7

PORTABLE HOUSE

/ A prefabricated module, able to settle into any natural setting, with one kit for each site /

LOCATION:
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
COMMISSIONED BY:
private client
YEAR:
2003 / 2012
STATUS:
commissioned study
PROGRAM:
residential
POSITION:
architect-in-charge
DIMENSIONS:
50 × 30 × 15 cm (study model)
MATERIALS:
plexiglas and tape
EXHIBITIONS:
International Biennale of Architecture of Santo Domingo (2006) — prize, as part of the thesis A Proposal to Inhabit

The module of my thesis A Proposal to Inhabit: a prefabricated module, able to settle into any natural setting, with one kit for each site. Designed in 2003 and studied for a private client in 2012, as architect-in-charge.

Its study model, 50 × 30 × 15 cm, is built in plexiglas and tape, and was awarded at the 2006 edition of the Santo Domingo International Architecture Biennial as part of the thesis. Two collages set the module on a beach and in the mountains.

The research question

Can one transportable module inhabit any natural setting?

Processes it proves

Start from what exists — a prefabricated module made to settle into any natural setting.

Core and configurations

One drawing, any medium — a study model in plexiglas and tape, then collages that set the module on a beach and in the mountains.

COLONNE DE LA PAIX An outdoor sculpture in collaboration with artist Malam; suspended; not installed 2025
Colonne de la Paix / simulated image (Paris, 2025)
Colonne de la Paix / simulated image (Paris, 2025)
1/5

COLONNE DE LA PAIX

/ An outdoor sculpture in collaboration with artist Malam; suspended; not installed /

LOCATION:
Cité Universitaire, Paris
COMMISSIONED BY:
La Maison de l'Agriculture
YEAR:
2025
STATUS:
suspended — not installed
FORMAT:
sculpture
TECHNIQUE:
cast resin, Corten steel
DIMENSIONS:
400 × 60 cm
POSITION:
Technical Consultant
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Malam (artist)

An outdoor sculpture for Paris by the Cameroonian artist Malam, commissioned by La Maison de l'Agriculture for the Cité Universitaire and set to be built in the summer of 2025: a column 400 × 60 cm in cast resin and Corten steel. The work is Malam's. My role was technical consultant on the construction and the permanence of the column on site.

The project was suspended, and the sculpture was not installed. The collaboration did not begin there: in February and March 2016 I worked in Malam's studio at the Cité internationale des arts.

Processes it proves

The work of another — technical consultant to the artist Malam for a 400 × 60 cm column in cast resin and Corten steel: its construction and permanence on site. Suspended before installation.

RIALENGO NO.4 A sculpture for a jewellery shop: the method of Rialengo No.3, taken to architectural scale 2020
RIALENGO NO.4, image 1 of 6
1/6

RIALENGO NO.4

/ A sculpture for a jewellery shop: the method of Rialengo No.3, taken to architectural scale /

LOCATION:
shopping mall, Dominican Republic
COMMISSIONED BY:
private client
YEAR:
2020
STATUS:
direct commission — completed
PROGRAM:
sculpture for a jewellery shop
POSITION:
Artist-Sculptor — design and construction
TECHNIQUE:
480 CNC-cut 10 mm MDF profiles, screwed, automotive paint
DIMENSIONS:
two halves of 2.4 m drawn; 5 m built

A sculpture for the front of a jewellery shop, and my first major commission as a sculptor in the Dominican Republic. It uses the method I created for Rialengo No.3: each layer drawn one by one, between two others. Here the drawing became 480 profiles, 240 for each half, CNC-cut in 10 mm MDF, screwed one to the next and finished in automotive paint.

The layer is about 8.3 times thicker than in Rialengo No.3, so the sculpture grew in proportion to keep its detail. Drawn as two halves of 2.4 m, 4.8 m in all, it was built at 5 m: screwing, gluing and the minimum gap between layers add length, and the design allows for it.

The research question

How do you draw the cutting plan of every piece so that a laser or a CNC can cut it?

Processes it proves

Drawing to Build

One drawing, any medium — the method of Rialengo No.3 at about eight times the scale: the layer grows from 1.2 to 10 mm.

1 ≠ 1 — drawn at 4.8 m, built at 5 m, +4 %: screwing, gluing and the minimum gap between layers add length, and the design allows for it.

STUDIO MICHAEL SAILSTORFER A series of sculptures for several of his exhibitions: full-scale originals in cardboard and tape, exact enough for another hand to turn them into the sculpture 2018
STUDIO MICHAEL SAILSTORFER, image 1 of 5
1/5

STUDIO MICHAEL SAILSTORFER

/ A series of sculptures for several of his exhibitions: full-scale originals in cardboard and tape, exact enough for another hand to turn them into the sculpture /

LOCATION:
Berlin, Germany
COMMISSIONED BY:
Studio Michael Sailstorfer
YEAR:
2018
POSITION:
freelance designer
EXHIBITIONS:
Brainspotting, Avlskarl Gallery (Copenhagen, 2018)

In 2018 Michael Sailstorfer engaged me as a freelance designer. I designed and built a series of sculptures for several of his exhibitions of that period: the full-scale originals, in corrugated cardboard and tape, from which subcontractors produced the casts and the hyper-realist finish. I also worked with him on the exhibition design and the selection of works for those shows, which are his.

The way I used the tape gave the pieces their expression. Michael Sailstorfer saw that it should not be lost in the casting, and the final bronzes were painted hyper-realistically, to show exactly what I had built. My workbook records the full-scale casting models made for Brainspotting, Avlskarl Gallery, Copenhagen, 2018.

The research question

What does a cast have to keep of the way its original was built?

Processes it proves

Drawing to Build — full-scale originals in cardboard and tape, exact enough to be the casting order.

One drawing, any medium — corrugated cardboard and tape, cast in bronze and painted.

Decorum — the bronzes were painted hyper-realistically to keep it.

BELOVED VEILS One person, drawn and redrawn over four years, 2018 2018
Veil No.1 (detail) / study, 2018
Veil No.1 (detail) / study, 2018
1/7

BELOVED VEILS

/ One person, drawn and redrawn over four years, 2018 /

YEAR:
2018
STATUS:
study development
FORMAT:
drawing
TECHNIQUE:
ink and graphite on paper
DIMENSIONS:
variable — first phase, 12 drawings: 5 of 150 × 150 cm, 5 of 300 × 150 cm and 2 of 300 × 300 cm

Twenty-four veils of one person, drawn and redrawn from memory over four years, each a different way of remembering the same individual. As the face disappears, the subject loses gender, race and age and becomes 'the memory of everything else reflected on the portrait of one specific individual'.

I call the veils informal cartographies, the term of my maps of territory. A first phase of twelve drawings in ink and graphite on paper, up to 300 × 300 cm, remains in study development. Two of the studies became Part in Style; FAR carries them to 122 × 180 cm.

The research question

How does one person's memory become the map of everything else?

Processes it proves

The map as method — informal cartographies: the map of one person's memory.

Core and configurations — one person is the core; twenty-four veils are its configurations.

One drawing, any medium — its studies continue in Part in Style and in FAR.

PART IN STYLE Two studies from Beloved Veils taken to 360 × 240 cm on wood: memory and history as tangible bodies 2017
PART IN STYLE, image 1 of 3
1/3

PART IN STYLE

/ Two studies from Beloved Veils taken to 360 × 240 cm on wood: memory and history as tangible bodies /

COMMISSIONED BY:
Cultural Center of Spain in Santo Domingo — CCESD
YEAR:
2017 – ongoing
STATUS:
completed (1st phase) / study development (2nd phase)
FORMAT:
drawing
TECHNIQUE:
ink, graphite and polyurethane on wood (1st phase)
DIMENSIONS:
series of 2 drawings — 360 × 240 cm each (1st phase)
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Cristina Rico (curator)
EXHIBITIONS:
Ausentes (Santo Domingo, 2017)

Two drawings, 360 × 240 cm each, in ink, graphite and polyurethane on wood, commissioned by the Cultural Center of Spain in Santo Domingo and shown in my solo exhibition Ausentes (2017), curated by Cristina Rico. They come from Beloved Veils: two of its twenty-four studies became this project.

The text asks what happens when someone is forced to leave a country and start again elsewhere: memory and history, it says, stop being unconscious and become 'conscious and tangible bodies'. A second phase is in study development.

The research question

What happens to the memory of someone who has to leave their country?

Processes it proves

The map as method — the map of memory becomes a tangible body.

Core and configurations — two configurations of the same core, at the scale of a body.

One drawing, any medium — two of the twenty-four studies of Beloved Veils, at 360 × 240 cm on wood.

ON ABSENCE After the Paris attacks, twenty-six anonymous portraits rather than the known victims: a memory more than a likeness 2016
ON ABSENCE, image 1 of 10
1/10

ON ABSENCE

/ After the Paris attacks, twenty-six anonymous portraits rather than the known victims: a memory more than a likeness /

LOCATION:
Cité internationale des arts, Paris — artist residency
COMMISSIONED BY:
IFAA
YEAR:
2016
STATUS:
completed
FORMAT:
drawing
TECHNIQUE:
pastel, charcoal and graphite on paper
DIMENSIONS:
series of 26 drawings — 22 of 45 × 60 cm and 4 of 70 × 100 cm
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Sithabile Mlotshwa (curator)
EXHIBITIONS:
Monsters (Paris, 2016) · Ausentes (Santo Domingo, 2017)

Twenty-six portraits in pastel, charcoal and graphite, drawn at the Cité internationale des arts, Paris, in the months after the attacks of November 2015; commissioned by IFAA, curated by Sithabile Mlotshwa, and shown in Monsters (Paris, 2016) and Ausentes (Santo Domingo, 2017).

If the attacks stirred patriotism and nationalism among the local-born, what did they stir among immigrants? I drew anonymous people rather than the known victims, keeping a distance that lets the viewer imagine the person could be oneself, a friend, a relative. Pastel works against the immediacy of the realistic portrait: the figure stays behind a blur, and the drawing carries a memory more than a likeness.

The research question

If the attacks stirred patriotism and nationalism among the local-born, what did they stir among immigrants?

PRISONERS A cartography of an informal urban fabric — La Medina, Dakar, 2016 2016
PRISONERS, image 1 of 4
1/4

PRISONERS

/ A cartography of an informal urban fabric — La Medina, Dakar, 2016 /

LOCATION:
Dakar, Senegal
COMMISSIONED BY:
IFAA
YEAR:
2016
STATUS:
completed
FORMAT:
installation
TECHNIQUE:
nails, string and spray
DIMENSIONS:
300 × 600 × 5400 cm
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Sithabile Mlotshwa (curator) / 10000 Problèmes (project assistant)
EXHIBITIONS:
Dak'Art 2016 — OFF Program (Dakar, 2016)

The brief was to map the historic sector of La Medina, in Dakar. The response was a series of informal maps, traced, in my word written, in nails, string and spray, from the view of a first-time visitor: a red installation fifty-four metres long.

It was commissioned by IFAA, curated by Sithabile Mlotshwa, and shown in the OFF Program of Dak'Art 2016. Its central sentence, informal maps as a way to recognise a territory and to pass tradition on, returns almost word for word in my texts of 2018 and 2025.

The research question

How can informal maps recognise a territory and pass its tradition on?

Processes it proves

The map as method — La Medina mapped through the eyes of a first-time visitor.

One drawing, any medium

RIALENGO NO.3 A block of wood cut in sections: the core, and the three moulds that carving usually throws away, kept and shown 2015
RIALENGO NO.3, image 1 of 8
1/8

RIALENGO NO.3

/ A block of wood cut in sections: the core, and the three moulds that carving usually throws away, kept and shown /

YEAR:
2015
STATUS:
completed
TECHNIQUE:
sculpture on wood made in 4 pieces
DIMENSIONS:
three pieces of 24 × 48 × 6 cm each and one piece of 74 × 18 × 12 cm
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
MQ Creative Lab (laser cut)
EXHIBITIONS:
All Inclusive (Berlin, 2015)

A block of wood drawn layer by layer, never more than two at a time. A single volume of four hundred 1.2 mm oak layers, each drawn one by one, laser-cut by MQ Creative Lab and screwed one to the next, is split lengthwise into three to uncover its core: four pieces, each of four hundred layers. The core reads as a traditional sculpture and stands on legs that are not part of the layered volume; the three outer pieces are its moulds, what carving usually throws away, kept and shown.

Rialengo is the Dominican word for the animals that live in the street. It is one of my first works on absence: the void, made visible. The work was shown in two formats: the sculpture, in All Inclusive during Berlin Art Week 2015, and the drawing, printed in fifteen sections, at Art Vilnius '16. Those fifteen sections now form the animation on the home page of this site, and the sculpture, mirrored — as one side grows, the other disappears, and the other way round — is the mark of Yuri Leonardo Works.

The research question

How do you draw the cutting plan of every piece so that a laser or a CNC can cut it?

Processes it proves

Drawing to Build — 400 layers of 1.2 mm oak, each drawn one by one, laser-cut by MQ Creative Lab and screwed one to the next.

Core and configurations — one volume of 400 layers, split lengthwise into three, uncovers its core: four pieces of 400 layers each.

One drawing, any medium — mirrored, it is the YLW logo.

O TENDER FELLOWS Two Dominican questions, drawn until the figures exceed any notion of race and origin: the migrant who returns in my later work 2014
O TENDER FELLOWS, image 1 of 8
1/8

O TENDER FELLOWS

/ Two Dominican questions, drawn until the figures exceed any notion of race and origin: the migrant who returns in my later work /

LOCATION:
Sala María Ugarte, Cultural Center of Spain in Santo Domingo — CCESD
YEAR:
2014
STATUS:
completed
FORMAT:
drawing and collage — solo exhibition
TECHNIQUE:
pencil on paper · collage
DIMENSIONS:
8 drawings and 14 collages
IN COLLABORATION WITH:
Cristina Rico (curator)
EXHIBITIONS:
O Tender Fellows, solo exhibition (Santo Domingo, February–March 2014)

Eight pencil drawings and fourteen collages on two Dominican questions: the sale of the land at Bahía de las Águilas, and the relationship between the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Solo exhibition at the Sala María Ugarte of the Cultural Center of Spain in Santo Domingo, February–March 2014, curated by Cristina Rico. The title is a line from Allen Ginsberg's Wichita Vortex Sutra.

In my statement, the way the pieces are built seeks the universal side of two local themes: the figures are transformed until they exceed any notion of race and origin, individuals from neither here nor there. The migrant returns as the subject of later work: On Absence (2016) and '15562' (2025).

FAR Working on memory: one beloved person, drawn and redrawn from memory over ten years — almost forty studies of what is kept and what is lost 2014
FAR, image 1 of 2
1/2

FAR

/ Working on memory: one beloved person, drawn and redrawn from memory over ten years — almost forty studies of what is kept and what is lost /

YEAR:
2024 – current phase / 2014 – 2017 (first phase)
STATUS:
ongoing
FORMAT:
drawing
TECHNIQUE:
acrylic, ink, graphite and polyurethane on wood
DIMENSIONS:
122 × 180 cm

One beloved person, drawn and redrawn from memory over and over again: almost forty studies since a first phase in 2014–2017, and a current phase begun in 2024, in acrylic, ink, graphite and polyurethane on wood. They are the same studies as Beloved Veils, on a format of 122 × 180 cm.

Each study answers a different need and is a different way of remembering the same individual. The question behind it is what migration does to memory, which I frame as 'the multiple lives (and deaths) of a single individual during his/hers own migratory movements'. It is ongoing.

The research question

What does migration do to memory?

Processes it proves

The map as method — the map of memory, redrawn over ten years.

Core and configurations — almost forty studies of one individual.

One drawing, any medium — the same studies as Beloved Veils, at 122 × 180 cm.

Education

  • Advanced Studies Diploma (DEA) in Project Criticism and Analysis ETSAB, Escola Tècnica Superior d'Arquitectura de Barcelona 2005–2008
  • Master's in Architectural Design ETSAB, Barcelona 2004–2005
  • Architect UNPHU, Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña, Santo Domingo 1998–2003 graduation thesis A Proposal to Inhabit, which won an award at the 2006 edition of the Santo Domingo International Architecture Biennial
  • Fine Furniture Making Diploma (CAP), furniture design and making École Boulle, Paris 2014–2015